🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it seems it’s time for a rethink. Throughout its history, an event that started out as a celebration and reminder of history, culture and the connections between international African diaspora communities, has adopted a corporate feel, broadening to incorporate gatherings where African descendants are compensated to speak with predominantly white listeners about hidden biases and “allyship”. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade sparked an increase in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. But even that moment has passed. The wave has reached its height, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was established in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with a week of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the US and Canada in winter, but also in October in the UK, Deutschland, the Republic of Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The period has evolved since its inception, giving reduced attention to the histories of transatlantic enslavement and civil rights battles, and greater focus on influential individuals of color in government, the arts, and social movements, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to mold society. It is in schools where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the way the month is celebrated is a reflection of the current political situation. How it develops is a instructive case in how assimilation leads to dismantling: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the purpose of it, which is to address embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how important it is to reevaluate Black History Month more than the current time in which it takes place this year. In the Britain, a reemerging right-wing in the shape of the Reform party is top in opinion ratings. In the warmer months we witnessed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in the history of Britain. the Conservative leader, the Black leader of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of anti-racism activism, and we are in a position where a legislator feels empowered to state that the absence of Caucasian individuals in specific city neighborhoods is a source of worry. Simultaneously, extreme conservative groups are expanding in the European continent as a whole.

In the America, a significant offensive against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been brought, often successfully, to the highest courts of the country. A effort to scrub the history of people of color and experience from the historical documents is ongoing. One of the former president's initial presidential directives targeted the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the prestigious establishment, claiming they of a organized and extensive campaign to change the national past” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

Given these circumstances, the celebration symbolises how minimally it can be effective if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or politically neutered celebrations of former accomplishments, rather than challenging the realities of the contemporary world. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is detached from the more extensive continuous action that is necessary. A university professor, a prof at an educational institution, expressed it perfectly when she voiced worries about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it frequently results in that Black History Month turns into a transient display rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Establishing how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a urge to just do away with things like Black History Month altogether, thinking they are no longer suitable, or are relics of an period that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and legacy of racial movements – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, inclusion and equity efforts, and certainly, even commercial engagements – represent an infrastructure that a considerable labor has been invested in. It is there not only to deteriorate as the politics moves on (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month appear as? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is spread out through the year (as some institutions are already starting to implement), parts of its content (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into school curriculums. It would also be a period that does not evade governmental matters, and allows opportunity for individuals, particularly youth, to express their concerns and stories. What value has mere awareness of the past when it doesn’t reckon with the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the urban areas? Organizations who mark it should not be pacified with the passive language of “unconscious bias” and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but confronted with the dangers that face all if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, urgent, and responsive. It could be that an total re-identification is required – Contemporary Black History Month.