🔗 Share this article

Europe felt a moment of respite on Monday, as the tension triggered by the introduction of a new comprehensive peace framework for resolving the conflict appeared – temporarily – to have been stabilised. A Washington representative spoke of "substantial progress" after diplomatic discussions in Geneva. On Monday night, Moscow made its countermove: an extensive attack of aerial bombardment on Kyiv.

The Cycle of Diplomacy and Destruction

The succession of conflicting incidents captured the grim essence of the outgoing year. By day, diplomatic battles are conducted: optimistic declarations are released from various governments. Significant resources is allocated on restraining particular approaches. By night, the Kremlin brutally reminds the world that, for them, conflict continues to be the key method for achieving "resolution".

Nocturnal Warfare

As the offensive unfolded into the early hours of Tuesday, the present situation of Ukraine's vulnerability was laid bare. Ukraine is capable of detecting rocket firings from across the border, a capability enabled by current data. From witness perspectives, defense planes that had been deployed to intercept incoming cruise missiles flew past – modern combat jets supplied to Ukraine by European allies.

Moments later, Kyiv's missile defense thundered: several firings targeted at a hostile projectile. This was a advanced protection mechanism at work, presumably supplied through allied countries. Every deployment creates sudden vibrations, causing tremors. The instant of fear quickly transforms into resigned acknowledgment: possibly the incoming missile won't cause damage this time, protecting urban areas from catastrophe and additional electricity failures.

Continuous Dangers

Following this, a heavy machine gun engaged a aerial vehicle close by, part of a rapid response unit – almost certainly Western-made equipment. Regrettably, the projectiles didn't strike the opposing UAV – it continued its flight toward its target.

Periodically, this continued until dawn. Kyiv faced the early updates: seven people killed, damage and heating outages in multiple buildings as a result of the evening attack. As typically, everyone still maintained normal activities – experiencing conflict. But those entire period encapsulated Ukraine's vital need on international aid – a need that European nations are demonstrably unable to fill in the near term.

Unsuccessful Negotiations

The 28-point plan from Washington provoked deep reactions, debate and profound anxiety – and briefly redirected concern from Ukraine's most significant graft case in years. Yet, we have witnessed similar scenarios, after previous diplomatic encounters and international summits.

Every new approach from Washington adheres to the identical sequence: a diplomatic cavalry charge against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with other European capitals, effectively counters. They stabilise the situation but never actually achieve victory. This pattern will, no doubt, persist.

Political Considerations

It is convenient to criticize specific actors of repeatedly advocating Russian terms. But that does not seem to be the complete picture. American leadership functions according to a principle well known to seasoned negotiators: you cannot secure via talks what you have failed to defend militarily. The US administration believes that it is impossible to pressure the Kremlin to abandon the territory that it presently holds in Ukraine's occupied territories.

The issue is that while recognising this factual reality, US leadership does nothing to discourage Russia, through statements or actions, from assuming that the situation will not change more in its benefit in the near future.

Opposing Positions

Therefore, the Kremlin is certain that duration works to their advantage – that Ukraine and its partners are coming close to fatigue. Their motivation to agree to terms that does not give them the greatest potential benefit is almost completely absent. There may be multiple initiatives to achieve ceasefire, but they will persist as long as Russia's leadership remains supremely confident in the outcome.

On the contrary, Ukrainian leadership believes that Ukraine can still persist, slowly losing lives and land but avoiding a entire defensive failure until conditions improve in its benefit.

Present Conditions

Factually, there are no actual prerequisites for a truce. Now, individual motivations are entering the equation: political desires to negotiate peace and obtain worldwide acknowledgment, and Ukrainian leadership's double obstacles – on one hand, not to estrange crucial supporters, and on the other, to rally Ukrainians around the flag against any proposal Kyiv finds unworkable, so that their priority does not switch to internal issues. And although their task will now be considerably more difficult after latest incidents, it remains quite doubtful that this will modify their basic position.

These conflicting dynamics are guiding negotiations.

Conclusion and Outlook

It took a only one week to eliminate the 28 points of the current initiative. Forceful and unpredictable management of the matter by Washington, opposition by Ukraine and the remaining European nations, along with calming attempts of representatives, and finally, current information leaks, all did their job.

While new proposals based on previous concepts are imminent, Kyiv, London and other allied nations should reach an essential realization: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to resist negotiation assaults from Washington that are based on Russian demands and demonstrate particular unwillingness to modify developments, if they remain united and enhance their military capacity at a considerably quicker tempo. If they do, neither political nor armed coercion will be able to defeat them. In the meantime, Ukraine's capability to counter nocturnal attacks will, for the foreseeable future, largely rely on continued Western support.